INVESTIGATING THE PREVALENCE OF DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY (DILI) AMONG ATHLETES WHO CONSUME UNREGULATED PRE-WORKOUTS AND WEIGHT-LOSS POWDERS IN PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Muhammad Abdul Jabar Adnan (Corresponding Author) Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of the Punjab, Lahore.
  • Rida Qasim Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore
  • Ali Raza Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Hafiz Ghulam Nabi Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Mehmet Dalkılıç Karamanoglu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi, Karaman, Türkiye
  • Muhammad Tahir Latif Higher Education Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Tahira Fozia Higher Education Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Sehab Afzal Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of the Punjab, Lahore

Keywords:

drug-induced liver injury, DILI, hepatotoxicity, pre-workout supplements, weight-loss powders, unregulated supplements, DRAP, liver function tests, sports nutrition, adulterants

Abstract

Background: The unregulated dietary supplement market in Pakistan has expanded dramatically, with pre-workout powders and weight-loss formulations widely available through online platforms and local sports nutrition retailers without regulatory oversight by the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP). Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) represents the leading cause of acute liver failure in many countries, yet systematic Pakistani data on supplement-induced hepatotoxicity among athletes remains critically absent.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of DILI among Pakistani athletes consuming unregulated pre-workout and weight-loss supplements, identify hepatotoxic ingredients in sampled products, assess severity grading of liver injury, and examine associations between consumption patterns and liver function test (LFT) abnormalities.

Methods: A mixed-methods observational study was conducted across five major cities of Pakistan (Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad, Peshawar, and Quetta) involving 380 athletes aged 18-35 years who reported regular consumption of unregulated supplements for at least three months. Comprehensive liver function tests (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, total bilirubin, albumin, and PT/INR) were performed. DILI was diagnosed and graded using CIOMS/RUCAM scale criteria. Chemical analysis of 87 supplement products was conducted at PCSIR laboratories. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk predictors.

Results: DILI prevalence was 37.9% (n=144/380) in the study cohort. Weight-loss supplement users showed the highest DILI prevalence (34.7%), followed by combined product users (42.1%). Severity grading revealed 38% mild (Grade 1), 31% moderate (Grade 2), 19% moderate-severe (Grade 3), 9% severe (Grade 4), and 3% acute liver failure (Grade 5). Chemical analysis detected adulterants including sibutramine (28%), dinitrophenol (DNP, 12%), and hidden anabolic steroids (39%) alongside hepatotoxic declared ingredients including DMAA (34%), synephrine (48%), and supraphysiological caffeine levels (61%). Duration of supplement use and polypharmacy were independent risk predictors for DILI (OR: 3.81 and 2.47 respectively, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: DILI prevalence among Pakistani athletes using unregulated supplements is alarmingly high. The widespread presence of undisclosed hepatotoxic adulterants in marketed products demands urgent regulatory action by DRAP, mandatory product screening, and structured public health education for athletes and coaches.

 

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Muhammad Abdul Jabar Adnan (Corresponding Author), Rida Qasim, Ali Raza, Hafiz Ghulam Nabi, Mehmet Dalkılıç, Muhammad Tahir Latif, Tahira Fozia, & Sehab Afzal. (2026). INVESTIGATING THE PREVALENCE OF DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY (DILI) AMONG ATHLETES WHO CONSUME UNREGULATED PRE-WORKOUTS AND WEIGHT-LOSS POWDERS IN PAKISTAN. The Journal of Research Review, 3(01), 592–607. Retrieved from https://thejrr.com/index.php/39/article/view/296