Peer Review Policy

The Journal of Research Review (JRR) is committed to publishing high-quality, original research articles that contribute significantly to the advancement of knowledge. Peer review is an essential component of this commitment, ensuring the integrity and rigor of published research. This policy outlines the principles and procedures for peer review at JRR.

2. Review Process:

• Double-blind review: All research articles submitted to JRR undergo a double-blind peer review process. This means that the reviewers' identities are concealed from the authors, and the authors' identities are concealed from the reviewers. This helps to ensure that the review process is fair and objective.
• Reviewer selection: Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the relevant field of research. They are also evaluated for their ability to provide constructive and objective feedback.
• Review criteria: Reviewers assess manuscripts based on the following criteria:
  • Originality: Does the research present new and significant findings?
  • Methodology: Is the research methodology sound and appropriate for the research question?
  • Results: Are the results presented clearly and accurately?
  • Discussion: Are the results interpreted in the context of existing literature?
  • Conclusion: Are the conclusions supported by the evidence?
  • Significance: What is the potential impact of the research?
• Review reports: Reviewers provide written reports that detail their assessment of the manuscript. These reports are confidential and are not shared with the authors.
• Editorial decision: The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision on whether to publish a manuscript based on the reviewers' reports and their own assessment of the manuscript.

3. Author Responsibilities:

• Authors are responsible for ensuring that their manuscripts are original, well-written, and meet the journal's submission guidelines.
• Authors are expected to respond to reviewers' comments in a timely and professional manner.
• Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

4. Reviewer Responsibilities:

• Reviewers are responsible for providing constructive and objective feedback on manuscripts.
• Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
• Reviewers should complete their reviews within the agreed-upon timeframe.